Based on transparency, user controls, retention, sharing, security history, and policy stability. Guidance, not a guarantee.
76/100
Risk breakdown
Transparency16/20
User Control15/20
Data Retention15/20
Data Sharing15/20
Security & History8/10
Policy Stability7/10
How this score was calculated
Privacy Plum scores tools based on transparency, user control, data retention, data sharing, security history, and policy stability. Scores are guidance, not guarantees.
Total Trust Score
76/100
Transparency
16/20
User Control
15/20
Data Retention
15/20
Data Sharing
15/20
Security & History
8/10
Policy Stability
7/10
Transparency16/20
Why this score
Transparency receives 16/20 because Privacy Plum sees strong risk signals for this tool. This is guidance based on available policy, control, retention, sharing, security, and stability signals, not a guarantee.
Good signs
Relevant policy information is available.
User-facing controls or explanations are documented.
The score is not driven by a single signal.
Concerns
Some details may still require reading multiple pages.
Recommended action
Good for normal use, but review settings before uploading sensitive information.
User Control15/20
Why this score
User Control receives 15/20 because Privacy Plum sees moderate risk signals for this tool. This is guidance based on available policy, control, retention, sharing, security, and stability signals, not a guarantee.
Good signs
Relevant policy information is available.
User-facing controls or explanations are documented.
The score is not driven by a single signal.
Concerns
Some details may be broad or hard to compare.
Users may need to review settings before sharing sensitive data.
Recommended action
Good for normal use, but review settings before uploading sensitive information.
Data Retention15/20
Why this score
Data Retention receives 15/20 because Privacy Plum sees moderate risk signals for this tool. This is guidance based on available policy, control, retention, sharing, security, and stability signals, not a guarantee.
Good signs
Relevant policy information is available.
User-facing controls or explanations are documented.
The score is not driven by a single signal.
Concerns
Some details may be broad or hard to compare.
Users may need to review settings before sharing sensitive data.
Recommended action
Good for normal use, but review settings before uploading sensitive information.
Data Sharing15/20
Why this score
Data Sharing receives 15/20 because Privacy Plum sees moderate risk signals for this tool. This is guidance based on available policy, control, retention, sharing, security, and stability signals, not a guarantee.
Good signs
Relevant policy information is available.
User-facing controls or explanations are documented.
The score is not driven by a single signal.
Concerns
Some details may be broad or hard to compare.
Users may need to review settings before sharing sensitive data.
Recommended action
Good for normal use, but review settings before uploading sensitive information.
Security & History8/10
Why this score
Security & History receives 8/10 because Privacy Plum sees strong risk signals for this tool. This is guidance based on available policy, control, retention, sharing, security, and stability signals, not a guarantee.
Good signs
Relevant policy information is available.
User-facing controls or explanations are documented.
The score is not driven by a single signal.
Concerns
Some details may still require reading multiple pages.
Recommended action
Good for normal use, but review settings before uploading sensitive information.
Policy Stability7/10
Why this score
Policy Stability receives 7/10 because Privacy Plum sees moderate risk signals for this tool. This is guidance based on available policy, control, retention, sharing, security, and stability signals, not a guarantee.
Good signs
Relevant policy information is available.
User-facing controls or explanations are documented.
The score is not driven by a single signal.
Concerns
Some details may be broad or hard to compare.
Users may need to review settings before sharing sensitive data.
Recommended action
Good for normal use, but review settings before uploading sensitive information.
What should I do?
Safe for normal use.
Avoid uploading sensitive files.
Review data controls.
Enable 2FA if available.
Use guidance here as risk signals, not a guarantee.
Best for
Everyday use when the data shared matches the tool's risk level.
Be careful with
Uploads, private chats, contact lists, and company documents.
Data types to avoid sharing
Passwords, financial data, health data, legal files, and confidential work files.
Safer alternatives
Coming soon: compare similar tools with stronger user controls.
Data types to be careful with
Personal documentsSchool filesBusiness filesFinancial detailsHealth informationPrivate messagesPhotos/videosLocation data
Plain-English Privacy Summary
Perplexity is scored on transparency, user controls, retention, sharing, security history, and policy stability. The current profile suggests good overall trust guidance for everyday users and teams.
Recent Policy Changes
Perplexity updated help-center language around account controls.
Perplexity clarified how product data may be used for service improvement.
Recommended Actions
Review privacy and AI training settings before sharing sensitive information.
Limit optional personalization and ad measurement where controls are available.
Use strong account security, including two-factor authentication when offered.
Source links
Source status: Partial
Source links point to official company pages when available. Missing sources are marked instead of guessed.